![]() Like, these are some of the most prominent and popular Mario species I've seen around here, how can you be just go and be like "nah, they're all clearly children", when it's canon that they're not and the artist even makes it very explicitly clear?!Īlso, "proportions changed to that of an adult". Seriously, when you say that Koopas and Yoshis, which have always been shown to have the same proportions from adolescence to old age, are not OK and having art that sticks to their canonical proportions is grounds for getting banned and having your art removed, don't expect me not to think there's an anterior motive behind this rule. Not only is this a very insane rule that is very loosely-worded and open to interpretation, but, as proven by what's happening to argonvile (combined with what I've heard from past FA ban controversies), it seems to be designed to actually target specific artists. And, I gotta say, it certainly delivers on the insanity I was promised! :( Well, as I'm slowly getting more active in the furry community, I guess it was just a matter of time before I'd end up witnessing one of those infamous FA controversies I've read about before. I take issues with Japan due to my feelings that there is a lot of female objectification in the media, like disproportionally-skewed, and I don't know if that's healthy considering how prevalent it is. For all its absurdity, the Japanese censor thing seems to be a pretty well-established formula that everyone understands and works within without too much trouble. I just think I'd prefer weird censorship rules over the mess that we see with FA and other places. I still think there's generally more freedom of sexual expression in fiction in places like Japan, even if that comes with the asterisk of 'but you gotta put little black bars everywhere'. It's weird, they seem less and more prudish about sex at the same time. I wouldn't say this system is at all better, just.different. Like, the laws have clear loopholes with that censorship over there it's almost expected to do so, and it robs the whole point of the law. I think the attitude is just different over there, though. How can anyone look at what is going on and not feel like facepalming. On top of that, trying to tend to the crying twitter puriteens on what is acceptable adult body look to your porn. lost the ability for high resolution uploads without paying? The only reason why I have a subscription is so I can get the full upload size, a feature that was FREE now costs $5 a month. Regardless of what is the truth actually is.Ĭan we please get a new website owner? The current one keeps making promises that still hasn't happened for over 10 years, at the same time claiming monthly subscriptions will go into improving the website, we got profile banners and. If your character design and art style not to FAs idea of what an adult body is What is child anatomy to a species? What is adult anatomy to fictional species? What if your drawing style is cutsie or chibi-like? ![]() ![]() They wish to target the most extreme cases of loli girls or furries in diapers that are with questionable features, which I understand, but what no one understands, is the line that cannot be crossed. I get what the policy is trying to do, I really do, but this is really stupid shit. " What matters is not who you are, but rather what you look like." FA says you are drawing child porn.Īlso if you are a kobold, otter, teacup griffon, avali, or if your fursona is small or dwarf like, you are a child, change your anatomy. If you draw chibi style, Pokemon, Digimon, My Little Pony, Asura from Guild Wars, Yordles from League of Legends, etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |